Comments on: When Honesty Appears Missing From the Policy http://www.clearlynewmexico.com/journalwatch/?p=1288 Wed, 08 Sep 2010 23:13:26 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Polluting Page One http://www.clearlynewmexico.com/journalwatch/?p=1288&cpage=1#comment-1847 Polluting Page One Wed, 05 May 2010 15:43:57 +0000 http://www.clearlynewmexico.com/journalwatch/?p=1288#comment-1847 [...] years of carrying water for the oil industry in both editorials and flawed opinion pieces, it is too much to expect the Journal to run a front-page analysis critical of the [...] [...] years of carrying water for the oil industry in both editorials and flawed opinion pieces, it is too much to expect the Journal to run a front-page analysis critical of the [...]

]]> By: E Junker http://www.clearlynewmexico.com/journalwatch/?p=1288&cpage=1#comment-1265 E Junker Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:47:10 +0000 http://www.clearlynewmexico.com/journalwatch/?p=1288#comment-1265 The author breezes right past the part about "data forgeries". Further, the author mis-characterizes the argument proffered by Noon and then makes a miserable attempt to discredit it. Fail. There is no creditable (verifiable) evidence to suggest the existence of anthropogenic global warming or as the position seems to be morphing to, "Climate Change". In fact the data not forged outright was so blatantly manipulated it has become the source of jokes in many scientific forums. Perhaps Ms. Tessier might profit from a further clarification of Noon's assertion: Cap and Trade is direct government interference in the market. Carbon Tax is an indirect (derivative) method of raising revenue. The fact is we live in the United States. The Federal government has precious few methods of collecting tax and a Carbon Tax would be one of them. I'll take a lawful (honest) excise tax on carbon consumption ever before a direct tax on my property (income) Applied Civil Science Lab & Field Testing Services The author breezes right past the part about “data forgeries”.

Further, the author mis-characterizes the argument proffered by Noon and then makes a miserable attempt to discredit it. Fail.
There is no creditable (verifiable) evidence to suggest the existence of anthropogenic global warming or as the position seems to be morphing to, “Climate Change”. In fact the data not forged outright was so blatantly manipulated it has become the source of jokes in many scientific forums.

Perhaps Ms. Tessier might profit from a further clarification of Noon’s assertion: Cap and Trade is direct government interference in the market. Carbon Tax is an indirect (derivative) method of raising revenue.

The fact is we live in the United States. The Federal government has precious few methods of collecting tax and a Carbon Tax would be one of them. I’ll take a lawful (honest) excise tax on carbon consumption ever before a direct tax on my property (income)

Applied Civil Science
Lab & Field Testing Services

]]>